EXPLORING THE APPLICATION AND EFFECT OF 5-IN-1 STRATEGIES IN TEACHING MATHEMATICS

Authors

  • Patrick Guillena Galleto Jose Rizal Memorial State University
  • Gerwil R Descallar

Keywords:

exploring application, effect, teaching strategies, performance

Abstract

Teaching strategies help students take more responsibility for their own learning and enhance the process of teaching for learning. This study aimed to find out the application and effect of strategies in teaching Mathematics among Grade 7 students of Kipit Agro-Fishery National High School, Labason, Zamboanga del Norte, School Year 2015–2016. Quasi–experimental method of research utilizing the Pretest–Posttest Nonequivalent Group Design was employed in which the experimental group with 51 students was exposed to 5-in-1 strategies in teaching Mathematics while the control group with 46 students was exposed to the traditional talk-chalkeraser strategy. The teacher–made–questionnaire consisting of 60 items was used to determine the pretest and posttest performance of the students in both groups. The statistical methods used were the arithmetic mean, z – test one – sample group, t – test for independent samples, and t – test for correlated samples. The study revealed that the 5-in-1 strategies in teaching Mathematics which greatly influenced students’ academic performance showed substantive proof or evidence of their effectiveness. This necessitates that teachers and students should collaborate actively in constructing mathematical knowledge through the use of 5-in-1 strategies that encourage them to explore and investigate mathematical ideas. Moreover, teachers and students should cooperate in the teaching and learning of Mathematics to ascertain high level of students’ performance which is reflective of the students’ success and teachers’ teaching achievement.

References

Astin, A. W. (2005). What Matters in College. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publisher

Bermudo, C.B. & Bermudo, A.B. (2007). Micro Analysis (Test Checker and Item Analyzer with Statistics). Workbook Version . ISBN 978-971-93567-6-9.

Cavanagh, S. (2007). Math’s anxiety confuses the equation for students. Education Week, 26 (24), 12.
De Las Peñas, M.L.A. & Bautista, D.M. (2012). On Maximizing Technology Resources and Their Benefits In Teaching and Learning Mathematics. Ateneo de Manila University, Philippines. http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:O2i0bBpoYsgJ:tsg.icme11.org/document/get/223+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ph. Accessed 24 September 2015.

DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015. Policy Guidelines on Classroom Assessment for the K to 12 Basic Education Program. https://www.scribd.com/doc/260853903/DO-s2015-08-Classroom-Assessment-for-K-to-12. Accessed 24 September 2015.

Duncan, A. (2011). Sharpening Mathematics Tools for the 21st Century, NCTM Summing Up. http://www.nctm.org/about/content.aspx?id=29275. Accessed 27 September 2015.

Farren, V. (2008). A reflection on my teaching practices using students’ math moments. College Quarterly, 11 (4), 74-81.

Gallenstein, N. (2009). Engaging young children in science and mathematics. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 17 (2), 27-41. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ798816. Accessed 24 September 2015.

Galleto, P.G. & Refugio, C.N. (2012). Students’ Skills In Mathematical Computation Using Graphing Calculator. http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:i154sOnrNUsJ:atcm.mathandtech.org/ep2012/regular_papers/3472012_19901.pdf+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ph. Accessed 29 September 2015.

Galleto, Patrick G. (2014). Utilization of TI-84 Plus in Teaching Trigonometry. The Threshold, Volume IX, 9 - 18.

Gargiulo, R.M., & Metcalf, D. (2010). Teaching in today’s inclusive classrooms: A universal design for learning approach. Belmont, CA. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Idris, N. & Meng, C.C. (2011). Effect of Graphic Calculator-Based Performance Assessment on Mathematics Achievement. Academic Research International, Volume 1, Issue 1. http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:fhuv1el3VE8J:www.savap.org.pk/journals/ARInt./Vol.1(1)/2011(1.1-01).pdf+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ph. Accessed 11 January 2016.

Imelda, S. N. and Muyangwa, M. M. (2006). Introduction to Research in Education and Behavioral Sciences. Pretoria: Publication and Dessign SelVices, TUT

Ingram, S. (2011). What is a strategy: Fundamentals of strategic planning. Actionable Strategic Planning. http://www.actionablestrategicplanning.com/?p=61. Accessed 27 September 2015.

Jacobs, A., (2007). Fun and games. Teaching Pre K-8, 37 (4), 54-55.

Ke, F., (2007). Gameplaying for maths learning: Cooperative or not?. Journal of EducationalTechnology, 38 (2), 249-259.

Khurshid, F. & Ansari, U. (2012). Effects of Innovative Teaching Strategies on Students’ Performance. Global Journal of HUMAN SOCIAL SCIENCE Linguistics & Education, Volume 12 Issue 10 Version 1.0. https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:CQ5CeUL_5OgJ:https://globaljournals.org/GJHSS_Volume12/7-Effects-of-Innovative-Teaching-Strategies-on-Students-Performance.pdf+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ph. Accessed 12 January 2016.

Kirkey, T. (2010). Differentiated instruction and enrichment opportunities: An action research report. Action Researcher, 8 (3), 10-13.

Lach, T. (2007). Let’s do math: Wanna play?. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 11 (4), 172-176.

Levy, H. (2008). Meeting the needs of all students through differentiated instruction: Helping every child reach and exceed standards. Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 81 (4), 161-164. http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:jQw7LARDgZQJ:www.wou.edu/~tbolsta/web/texbook/24_Meeting_the_Needs.pdf+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ph

Moore, N.D. (2012). Alternative Strategies for Teaching Mathematics. Education and Human Development Master's Theses. http://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/ehd_theses/130/ Accessed 30 September 2015.

Olatoye, R.A. & Adejoya, Y.M. (2009). Effect of four teaching strategies on senior secondary students’ achievement in an aspect of agricultural science. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Science, Volume 7. http://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajesms/article/view/61569. Accessed 11 January 2016.

Rapp, W. (2009). Avoiding math taboos: Effective math strategies for visual-spatial learners.Teaching Exceptional Children Plus, 6 (2), 121-135.

Stuart, V. B. (2009) “Math Curse or Math Anxiety”. http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:2ddE0UfdcVoJ:driscollmathathome.weebly.com/uploads/1/9/8/5/19850427/tcm2000-01-330a.pdf+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ph. Accessed 28 September 2015.

Whitehurst, G. (2003). Research on mathematics instruction. Paper presented at the Secretary's Summit on Mathematics, Washington, DC. https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/research/progs/mathscience/whitehurst.html. Accessed 30 September 2015.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-03