Understanding Conflict Management and Collaborative Efficacy in Undergraduate Research Groups: A Sequential Explanatory Mixed Methods Study

Authors

  • Hyacinth Pactol Northwestern Mindanao State College of Science and Technology
  • Karen Malalis Northwestern Mindanao State College of Science and Technology
  • Jessie Candawan Northwestern Mindanao State College of Science and Technology
  • Joanne Catugal Northwestern Mindanao State College of Science and Technology
  • Dave A. Duhaylungsod Northwestern Mindanao State College of Science and Technology
  • Vincent Isidore Lagang Northwestern Mindanao State College of Science and Technology
  • Al-Vincent Maghanoy Northwestern Mindanao State College of Science and Technology
  • Christine delos Reyes Northwestern Mindanao State College of Science and Technology
  • Steve I. Embang NMSCST
  • Julie Mar M. Regis Northwestern Mindanao State College of Science and Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65023/jherd.v10i2.298

Abstract

This study employed a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design to examine the relationship between collaborative efficacy and conflict management effectiveness among undergraduate research groups. In the first phase, quantitative data were collected through a census of 843 students engaged in thesis, capstone, or group research projects across academic disciplines at a state college in Northern Mindanao. Descriptive and inferential analyses revealed that collaborative efficacy and conflict resolution strategies were practiced to a great extent, with collaborating identified as the most dominant style. Regression analysis confirmed that collaborative efficacy significantly predicts conflict management effectiveness, highlighting its critical role in shaping constructive conflict behaviors. Building on these results, the second phase utilized qualitative methods, including in-depth interviews and focus group discussions, to explore the dynamics underpinning this relationship. Data were analyzed using Colaizzi’s phenomenological approach, generating four themes: Fragility of Trust, Communication as a Double-Edged Sword, Cohesion Through Shared Responsibility, and Conflict as a Catalyst for Growth. These findings provided deeper insight into how trust, communication quality, and shared accountability mediate the operationalization of collaborative efficacy in conflict resolution contexts. The integration of quantitative and qualitative findings highlights the importance of incorporating structured interventions—such as team-based learning strategies, conflict management training, and reflective practices—into higher education curricula to enhance collaboration and adaptability among student research groups.

References

Alper, S., Tjosvold, D., & Law, K. S. (2023). Conflict management, efficacy, and performance in organizational teams. Human Performance, 36(2), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2022.2144786

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Chang, A., & Bordia, P. (2001). A Multidimensional Approach to the Group Cohesion-Group Performance Relationship. Small Group Research, 32(4), 379–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640103200401

Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. S. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 48–71). Oxford University Press.

Creswell, John & Clark, Vicki. (2023). Revisiting Mixed Methods Research Designs Twenty Years Later. 10.4135/9781529614572.n6.

De Dreu, C. K. W., & Gelfand, M. J. (2021). The psychology of conflict and conflict management in organizations. Psychology Press https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203810125

De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741-749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741

Desivilya, H.S., & Eizen, D. (2005). Conflict Management In Work Teams: The Role of Social Self-Efficacy and Group Identification. International Journal of Conflict Management, 16, 183-208.

Deutsch, M. (1949). A Theory of Co-operation and Competition. Human Relations, 2(2), 129-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674900200204.

Elms, A. K., Gill, H., & Gonzalez-Morales, M. G. (2022). Confidence is key: collective efficacy, team processes, and team effectiveness. Small Group Research, 54(2), 191–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964221104218

Feitosa, J., Davis, A. S., Romain, R., & Delice, F. (2023). Team Membership change events: processes that support gender diverse teams. Small Group Research, 55(3), 375–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964231209924

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Frontiers in Education. (2023). Self‑efficacy for learning beliefs in collaborative contexts: relations to pre‑service early childhood teachers’ vicarious teaching self‑efficacy. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1210664 (Frontiers).

Garcia, R., Araújo, V., Mascarini, S., Santos, E. G., & Costa, A. R. (2019). How long-term university-industry collaboration shapes the academic productivity of research groups. Innovation, 22(1), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2019.1632711

Gully, S. M., Incalcaterra, K. A., Joshi, A., & Beaubien, J. M. (2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 819–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.819

Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2005). A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 269-287.DOI: 10.5465/amr.2005.16387885

Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2005). Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design: From Theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x05282260

Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 238–251. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069453

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Interaction Book Company. Retrieved from: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Cooperation%20and%20Competition%3A%20Theory%20and%20Research&publication_year=1989&author=D.W.%20Johnson&author=R.T.%20Johnson

Johnson, D & Johnson, F. (2019). Joining together : group theory and group skills / David W. Johnson, Frank P. Johnson. SERBIULA (sistema Librum 2.0). 27. 10.1921/gpwk.v27i3.1263

Lent, R. W., Sheu, H., Singley, D., Schmidt, J. A., Schmidt, L. C., & Gloster, C. S. (2008). Longitudinal relations of self-efficacy to outcome expectations, interests, and major choice goals in engineering students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(2), 328–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.07.005

Lin, Y., Dowell, N. M. M., & Godfrey, A. (2021). Skills matter: Modeling the relationship between decision making processes and collaborative problem-solving skills during hidden profile tasks. LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, 428–437. https://doi.org/10.1145/3448139.3448180

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

Lindsley, D. H., Brass, D. J., & Thomas, J. B. (1995). Efficacy-Performance Spirals: A Multilevel Perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 645-678.

Maker, C. J. (2021). From leading to guiding, facilitating, and inspiring: a needed shift for the 21st century. Education Sciences, 12(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010018

Mayer, J.D., Caruso, D. R., & Salovey, P. (2016). The ability model of emotional intelligence: Principles and updates. Emotion Review, 8, 1-11. DOI: 10.1177/1754073916639667

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED565763

Mok, S. S., Sukimin, I. S., Abidin, N. S. Z., Rahmat, N. H., Anyau, E., & Varma, S. B. (2021). Conflicts in Group Work: Are they all Bad? International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(11). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i11/11246

Mydin, F., Rahman, R. S. a. R. A., & Mohammad, W. M. R. W. (2021). Research Collaboration: Enhancing the research skills and Self-Confidence of early career academics. Asian Journal of University Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1309465

Naughton, D. (2006). Cooperative Strategy Training and Oral Interaction: Enhancing Small Group Communication in the Language Classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 169-184.

Oakley, B., Ragowsky, B., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2021). Uncommon sense teaching: Practical insights in brain science to help students learn]. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy / Revue canadienne en administration et politique de l’éducation, (202), 188–190. https://doi.org/10.7202/1099991ar

Patton, M. (2015) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 4th Edition, SaGE Publications, Thousand Oaks. - References - Scientific Research Publishing. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1915688

Rahim, M. A. (2011). Managing conflict in organizations (4th ed.). Transaction Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203984529

Rapp, T. L., Bachrach, D. G., Rapp, A. A., & Mullins, R. (2022). The role of team efficacy in shaping individual efficacy and performance: Evidence from team-based learning contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(8), 1309–1323. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000987

Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Miller, C. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Vessey, W. B. (2023). Teams in space: Understanding team effectiveness in isolated, confined, and extreme environments. American Psychologist, 78(2), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000965

Shenton, A. (2004). Strategies for Ensuring Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research Projects. Education for Information. 22. 63-75. 10.3233/EFI-2004-22201.

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Sage. https://www.academia.edu/download/52342902/SAGE_Handbook_of_Mixed_Methods_in_Social___Behavioral_Research.pdf

Thomas, K., and Kilmann, R. (1974). Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument. Escon-dido, Calif.: Blanchard Training and Development.

Tjosvold, D., Wan, P., & Tang, M. M. L. (2016). Trust and Managing Conflict: Partners in developing organizations. In Industrial relations & conflict management (pp. 53–74). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31475-4_4

Tjosvold, D. (2008). The conflict-positive organization: It depends upon us. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.473

Tjosvold, D. (2023). Cooperative and competitive goal structures: A meta-analytic review of research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(2), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2647

Van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A. H., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through Group-Based Anger and Group Efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 649–664. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): JHERD VOLUME 10

Section

Preliminary Pages